Here we present the results of the expert evaluators of our questionnaire in its preliminary version. There were fifteen experts: 5 national teaching and research staff; 5 international teaching and research staff, 3 administration and services staff and 2 doctoral students.
The evaluation of the dimensions was very positive, as can be seen in the following table, both in terms of relevance and in terms of adequacy.
Relevance. They assessed on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being the least relevant and 10 the most relevant, the relevance of the dimension “Axes of differentiation” to identify and make visible gender violence in university contexts.
Adequacy. They assessed on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being the least relevant and 10 the most relevant, the adequacy of the subdimensions that make up the dimension “Axes of differentiation” and their adequacy with the feminist perspective.
| DIMENSION | Mean | Min. | Percentile 25 | Percentile 75 | Max. | Standard deviation | |
| Rel. | Differentiation axis | 9,58 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0,32 |
| Adeq. | 9,05 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 0,36 | |
| Rel. | Academic/institutional position of power | 9,95 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0,05 |
| Adeq. | 9,42 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,22 | |
| Rel. | Identificación Efectos interseccionalidad | 9,05 | 5 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,39 |
| Rel. | Typologies of violence | 9,58 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,18 |
| Adeq. | 9,11 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 0,25 | |
| Rel. | Violent acts | 9,47 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0,29 |
| Adeq. | 9,37 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,22 | |
| Rel. | Contexts and assessment of violence | 9,58 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0,21 |
| Adeq. | 9,42 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,22 | |
| Rel. | Affectation of violence | 9,26 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,48 |
| Adeq. | 9,58 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0,19 |
The assessment of the subdimensions and the ITEMS has been carried out with these questions (Rated on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being the least relevant and 10 the most relevant)
- In your opinion, is the question _______ relevant to the dimension and subdimension in which it is located?
- In your opinion, is the question _______ clearly formulated and consistent with the intersectional feminist perspective?
- Do you consider that the response options proposed for question _______ are clear, exclusive, complete, and consistent with the intersectional feminist paradigm?
- All the items previously evaluated correspond to the “respondent” subdimension of the “axes of differentiation” dimension. Are these items sufficiently distinguished from each other (univocity)?
The mode of the vast majority of responses has been 10, being 9 in a few cases. The average has dropped from 8 on a single occasion with 7.8, being in most cases higher than 9.
Thank you!
